The
relentless encroachment of socialism upon America’s economic, cultural
and governmental landscape is like a bad dream to most red-blooded
Americans. When society changes it can seem like the ineluctable drift
of evolution or chance. But in the case of America’s ongoing continued
expansion of government powers, spiking taxes, and shrinking military,
it’s all part of a planned elitist push into socialism. And one need not
believe in secret conspiracies when contemplating this shift. In fact,
for those paying attention, it was all outlined long ago by the Fabian
Socialist society, and other groups such as the Frankfurt School, as
explained below.
I. Basic Socialism: History & Dogma
Socialism is a European phenomenon, beginning after the French
Revolution with writers from Paris and London forming the core. The
definition of socialism is: “a centrally planned economy in which the
government controls all means of production.” While most believe Karl
Marx (1818-1883) was the father of socialism, he wrote very few
specifics on the topic. In fact, one of Marx’s most signal shortcoming
was his failure to describe his own working economic system. Instead, it
was Vladimir Lenin (1870-1924), first leader of the new USSR who
developed the theory
in situ, according to the
Library of Economics & Liberty. Lenin’s attempts at creating a profit-free economy was a spectacular failure, only bettered by Joseph Stalin’s larger failure.
A. Vladimir Lenin’s ad hoc Socialism
The Library lists Vlad’s
four critical factors he believed necessary for economic success:
Lenin began from the long-standing delusion that economic
organization would become less complex once the profit drive and the
market mechanism had been dispensed with—“as self-evident,” he wrote, as
“the extraordinarily simple operations of watching, recording, and
issuing receipts, within the reach of anybody who can read and write and
knows the first four rules of arithmetic.”
The four laws were apparently insufficient to drive en economy towards productivity:
In fact, Soviet economic life under these first four
rules was so disheveled within four years of the 1917 revolution,
productivity fell to 14% of its pre-revolutionary level. By 1921 Lenin
was forced to institute the New Economic Policy (NEP), a partial return
to the market incentives of capitalism. This brief mixture of socialism
and capitalism ended in 1927 after Stalin instituted forced
collectivization meant to mobilize Russian resources for its leap into
industrial power.
Suffice it to say that no version of socialism has ever provided
longterm economic growth or security anywhere in the world, because it
lacks a cohesive economic theory.
B. Karl Marx’s Vision: Revolution
Karl Marx claimed to have discovered a “science” of economics that
proved his ideas true. In fact, according to author Paul Johnson in
Intellectuals, Marx was a moralizing journalist, with the faculty of a poet, masquerading as a science-minded intellectual.
Writes Johnson:
But in a deeper sense he was not really a scholar and not
a scientist at all. He was not interested in finding the truth but in
proclaiming it. There were three strands in Marx: the poet, the
journalist and the moralist. Each was important. Together, and in
combination with his enormous will, they made him a formidable writer
and seer. But there was nothing scientific about him; indeed, in all
that matters he was anti-scientific.
Further, according to Marx’s writing partner, lifelong benefactor and
friend, Frederick Engels, Marx should be remembered as a revolutionary.
He said
grave-side at Marx’s burial:
For Marx was before all else a revolutionist. His real
mission in life was to contribute, in one way or another, to the
overthrow of capitalist society and of the state institutions which it
had brought into being…
So Marx’s main interest in writing was to foment revolution, because
without the collapse of capitalism, the promised paradise of total
government control would never have room to occur. Knowing this,
American leftists have long done whatever they could, in small and large
ways to help birth the revolution upon American soil. The following is a
partial history of that struggle.
II. Congressional Record January 10, 1963
On January 10, 1963, Florida US Representative
Albert Sydney Herlong, Jr gave a speech outlining what he believed to be the
45 methods communists were using to take over America. Ponder the staggering number of these goals already achieved, much to our mortal damage.
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American
institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17. Control schools. Use them to transmit socialist & Marxist
propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Infiltrate teachers’ associations.
Put the party line in textbooks.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
22. Discredit American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression.
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. Promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting
pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio,
and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
27. Infiltrate churches. Replace revealed religion with “social”
religion. Discredit Bible & emphasize need for intellectual
maturity, rejecting a “religious crutch.”
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the
schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of
church and state.”
29. Discredit US Constitution by calling it inadequate,
old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation
between nations.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”
31. Belittle American culture & discourage teaching of American history because it’s only part of the “big picture.”
32. Support any socialist movement to centralize control over any
part of the culture: education, social agencies, welfare programs,
mental health clinics, etc.
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
III. Frankfurt School
The Frankfurt School were a group of German intellectual Marxists who
established the Institute of Social Research at Frankfurt University,
modeled after the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow. This became known as
the “Frankfurt School.” After Hitler came to power, these Marxist
professors fled to the West to preserve their lives. Setting up shop in
Columbia University, they decided to launch a mission to convert America
to Marxism via a soft war.
According to one source they did certain things to aid this:
To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural
revolution - but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future -
the Frankfurt School recommended (among other things):
- The creation of racism offences.
- Continual change to create confusion
- The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
- The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
- Huge immigration to destroy identity.
- The promotion of excessive drinking
- Emptying of churches
- An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
- Dependency on the state or state benefits
- Control and dumbing down of media
- Encouraging the breakdown of the family
A main idea of the Frankfurt School was exploiting Freud’s
‘pansexualism’ - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the
differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional
relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:
- attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of
father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary
educators of their children.
- abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
- abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces
- declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’
Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.’
IV. Fabian Society: Slow Conquering Socialism
The Fabian Society of Britain was named after Roman general
Fabius Maximus,
famed for a warfare style that eked out victories via patience and
attrition. Fabian socialists likewise seek to take over their host
countries by slowly changing standards until the dumbed-down populace no
longer has the wit to notice or care. A sociological analogy might
be—how predators groom their victims, often waiting years for a chance
to exploit their prey. An author
sums up their strategy:
Like their namesake, today’s Fabians avoid open
confrontation with the forces of freedom and, subsequently, tend to
shield their true agenda from the light of day.
The creed of the Society, written in 1887, was as follows:
“It (The Fabian Society) therefore aims at the reorganization of
society by the emancipation of land and industrial Capital from
individual and class ownership…The Society accordingly works for the
extinction of private property in land.”
The Fabian plan was to infiltrate America by targeting our legal
system. Fabian convert Felix Cohen, a law professor at Yale, wrote the
following:
“It is possible to attempt the overthrow of capitalism as an
economic system without at the same time attacking the substance of
capitalist law…Socialists can learn from their adversaries that it is
always possible to attack existing law, in the name of democracy,
justice, and liberty, in the name of the great ideals of the American
Constitution, and in the name of law itself.”
Fabians sought to overthrow our system by changing the meaning of our
stated legal concepts, and to codify those changes with cases brought
by Fabian lawyers before Fabian Judges. The effect of this has been that
while the technical wording of American law hasn’t changed much, the
implementation has been transferred from the citizen and his elected
representatives, to appointed bureaucrats. The Fabians have,
diabolically, used our own laws to change the law. Freedom is the victim
of these Socialist manipulations.
Conclusion
America is infiltrated by Marxists active so long in undermining our
institutions and ideals that socialism is now in our collective DNA.
They seek an end to private property, representative democracy and rule
of law. But once America has turned over leadership to committed
liberals, who will be left to protect the world from takeover by
globalists intent on universal tyranny? Unfortunately, the question
answers itself.
Kelly O’Connell
is an author and attorney. He was born on the West Coast, raised in Las
Vegas, and matriculated from the University of Oregon. After laboring
for the Reformed Church in Galway, Ireland, he returned to America and
attended law school in Virginia, where he earned a JD and a Master’s
degree in Government. He spent a stint working as a researcher and
writer of academic articles at a Miami law school, focusing on ancient
law and society. He has also been employed as a university Speech &
Debate professor. He then returned West and worked as an assistant
district attorney. Kelly is now is a private practitioner with a small
law practice in New Mexico. Kelly is now host of a daily, Monday to
Friday talk show at AM KOBE called AM Las Cruces w/Kelly O’Connell
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment