Search This Blog

Wikipedia

Search results

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

DARPA picks Northrop Grumman to build “tail-sitter” Navy strike drone prototype

Technology Lab / Information Technology

 http://arstechnica.com/

TERN "flying wing" would launch and land vertically on smaller ships' flight deck.

Back in the 1950s, the US Navy was looking for a way to give destroyers and frigates an effective way to take on enemy air attacks—a sort of "first responder" aircraft that could take to the skies to hold off hostile aircraft until carrier-based fighters arrived, and it could give those ships the ability to strike over the horizon at enemy ships. The answer they came up with was a "tail-sitter" propeller fighter aircraft that took off like a helicopter and transitioned into winged flight. While several experimental aircraft were developed, including the General Dynamics Corvair XFY-1 "Pogo" and the Lockheed XFV-1 (also known as the "Salmon"), these aircraft with counter-rotating propellers were never deployed—mostly because they couldn't match the airspeed of the jet aircraft they would likely face in combat, and the Navy was afraid pilots wouldn't be able to handle the complexities of landing the things on a small, pitching deck. The Navy instead focused on missile defenses and carrier battle group tactics, and they depended on helicopters to provide smaller ships with the ability to reach out further—to strike at submarines, provide gun spotting, and (with the MH-60 Sea Hawk helicopter) shoot up less robustly defended targets on the ground and on the sea.
But now those 1950s "tail-sitters" are looking more like they're back to the future. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency has asked Northrop Grumman to move forward with development of a drone that uses a similar approach to flying, intended to give smaller surface ships a stealthy, larger drone with capabilities on par with those currently flown by the Army and Air Force. Called the TERN (for "Tactically Exploited Reconnaissance Node"), the program is jointly funded by DARPA and the Office of Naval Research.
Northrop Grumman was one of two competitors involved in the TERN program, which up to this point has been largely conceptual. The Northrop Grumman design, like the Pogo and Salmon of the 1950s, uses coaxial, counter-rotating propellers to achieve vertical flight. But its body more closely resembles Northrop Grumman's other Naval drone prototype, the X-47B carrier drone.
In a statement released by DARPA, TERN Program Manager Dan Patt said, "The design we have in mind for the Tern demonstrator could greatly increase the effectiveness of any host ship by augmenting awareness, reach, and connectivity. We continue to make progress toward our goal to develop breakthrough technologies that would enable persistent ISR and strike capabilities almost anywhere in the world at a fraction of current deployment costs, time and effort.”
In English, that means that DARPA is counting on the more substantial flying-wing design to be more in the class of the Army's RQ-9 Reaper or MQ-1C Grey Eagle (the Army's upgraded version of the MQ-1 Predator). A flying-wing TERN could carry Hellfire missiles, bombs, and other kinetically destructive packages to deploy against all manners of targets, launched stealthily from the deck of an inconspicuous Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) or destroyer well off the coast.
Such a drone would at least partially fill the holes in the LCS' never-realized role in providing fire support for Marines ashore with the canceled NLOS missile system. The deputy program manager for TERN, Gil Graff of the Office of Naval Research, said in a DARPA-published statement, "If successful, TERN could open up exciting future capabilities for Navy small-deck surface combatants and U.S. Marine Corps air expeditionary operations.” And by "exciting," Graff probably meant "actually can blow things up." By comparison, the current drone deployed on LCS ships, Northrop Grumman's MQ-8 Fire Scout—a helicopter drone that was a survivor of the Army's Future Combat Systems program—is mostly good for looking at things.
Northrop was selected over drone manufacturer AeroVironment, the other contender in the most recently completed, mostly conceptual phase of TERN. While details of AeroVironment's concept haven't been released, it's widely believed that the company was behind the "sidearm" approach for recovery being forwarded early in TERN's development—a mechanical arm that reaches out over the side of the ship to capture the drone as it returns. Another proposed deployment and recovery method created by the Maritime Applied Physics Corporation—using a towed parafoil "docking station" to capture and reel in the drone—has turned into a separate program entirely, called TALONS (Towed Airborne Lift of Naval Systems). Instead of acting as a drone snagger, TALONS could be used to give smaller ships and even patrol boats an over-the-horizon visual and radar sensor platform—putting up to 200 pounds of sensors as high as 1,000 feet in the air.

No comments:

Post a Comment